Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Ītkinson, Anthony Barnes, and Joseph E. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Ītkinson, Anthony Barnes. Nils Holtug and Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen, 262–293. In Egalitarianism: New Essays on the Nature and Value of Equality, ed. Philosophical Topics 32 (1/2): 1–20.Īrneson, Richard J. Luck Egalitarianism Interpreted and Defended. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Īrneson, Richard J. The Smart Theory of Moral Responsibility. Philosophy & Public Affairs 19 (2): 158–194.Īrneson, Richard J. Liberalism, Distributive Subjectivism, and Equal Opportunity for Welfare. Philosophical Studies 56 (1): 77–93.Īrneson, Richard J. Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.Īrneson, Richard J. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Īristotle. In Distributive Justice and Access to Advantage: G. The Fundamental Disagreement Between Luck Egalitarians and Relational Egalitarians. What Is the Point of Equality? Ethics 109 (2): 287–337.Īnderson, Elizabeth. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Īnderson, Elizabeth. New York, NY: The New Press.Īlstott, Anne, and Bruce A. Unjust Deserts: How the Rich Are Taking Our Common Inheritance and Why We Should Take It Back. Journal of Public Economics 95 (7–8): 488–499.Īlperovitz, Gar, and Lew Daly. R package version 1.11.Īlmås, Ingvild, et al. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Īllaire, J.J., et al. Well-Being and Fair Distribution: Beyond Cost-Benefit Analysis. Boston, MA: South End Press.Īdler, Matthew. Regulating the Lives of Women: Social Welfare Policy from Colonial Times to the Present. Journal of Public Economics 95 (3): 193–204.Ībramovitz, Mimi. Measuring Long-Term Inequality of Opportunity. 2000.Īaberge, Rolf, Magne Mogstad, and Vitorocco Peragine. Instead, control means caused to take values exclusively by endogenous factors.Ģ6 U.S. 126 Note that this definition of control is of categorical control (what Hurley names regressive control) Hurley ( 2003), 111 that is thicker than Hurley’s account in which “ Control … involves maintenance of a variable at a target value in the face of exogenous disturbance, where the variable is caused to take values jointly by factors endogenous and factors exogenous to a control system.
#Learning and behavior 7th chance chapter 4 test bank free
Arneson ( 2004) Nelkin ( 2013) Also, this is a non-egalitarian reformulation of Cohen’s point, “.egalitarian redress is indicated to the extent that a disadvantage does not reflect genuine choice.” Cohen ( 2011d) Due to its strong support by egalitarians when individuals are disadvantaged due to factors beyond their control, Lake names minor variations on this principle the “egalitarian intuition” or the “responsibility principle.” Lake ( 2001), 12–13 “An action is free in the sense required for moral responsibility only if it is not produced by a deterministic process that traces back to causal factors beyond the agent’s control.” Pereboom ( 2003), 3 also cf.
0 kommentar(er)
